367 to 156
(at least that is what it looks like at the moment, with a variance of only 29)

wow

Personally, I disapprove of political parties, but this is a best case scenario for a nation of voters deciding undeniably that they want action taken and have no desire for traditional smear and smoke.

Vivat Senator..erm…President Elect Obama!!!!

:)

HAHAHAHAH!!!

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!

HAHAHAHHAAHAHAHAHAHAHHHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!

The Final Debate!

Expect loads of details unmentioned, expect a lot of finger-pointing, expect mountains of dirty laundry.

And of course….

Expect me to be yelling my guts out like I was in the penalty box at a hockey game through it all.

Why?

If you read enough about the details on these issues you stop believing the rhetoric and start understanding that there are some serious policy differences between these guys. McCain doesnt like to lie, ergo you can tell when he’s talking on a subject where his plans benefit big business deliberately. Obama doesnt like to debate on energy because he is hardcore and wants to push in alternative energy sources earlier as opposed to what the energy lobbies are asking for (more time to be competitive financially), so he gets hit hard when discussing clean nuclear power and reluctance in offshore drilling.

It doesnt make these guys wrong…it simply tells you which you think would be better for US.

Ciao!

-Tony

Man, I have to give it to the onion. They have a “no man left behind” attitude when it comes to entertaining us.

Enjoy!

-T


Precocious Youngster Sells Cookies To Buy Attack Ad

Ahhh. Yet again. Our candidates for President are shown up by Hollywood’s Finest ;)

In a previous post HERE, I indicated the Paris kicked ass…well…she still does.

Please, be kind and remember these lessons, Paris is saying far less, providing simple answers involving very realistic solutions…that weren’t mentioned once in the last debate.

Scary eh?

So….

I’m watching the 2nd Presidential Debate (DVR is a wonderful thing). I’ve come to a conclusion about McCain and Obama.

One of the most prominent things that has come to mind is the need to hold a debate that fields questions held important by a younger demographic. The “town hall” debate room looked distinctly like a room full of retirees. This leads me to believe that those surveyed were not in a demographic that included ages 18-30.

Also, both Obama and McCain are far better examples of leaders suited to the White House than anyone in the past…at least up until I was born.
Here are some thoughts…

There has been decidedly less sucker-punching in the debates and the campaign by the candidates this term. That is not to say that their supporters are being so gracious, but the candidates are definitely being far more tactful with each other.

  • I am absolutely overjoyed that both candidates would love nothing more than to jail lobbyists that deliberately drown out the voice of the voters.
  • For the first time in the last decade, but candidates have conceded that Bush’s Reign of Ineptitude will not be continued by the next administration.
  • Both candidates recognize the need for financial restructuring of our economy and government spending. Their reason and methodology are fundamentally completely different (and diametrically opposed from the lobby and corporate perspectives), but the need for change is evident, both want to do something about it.
  • I abhor any leader that uses fear for gain, much less to maintain their office. McCain’s campaign is using it more than Obama, but I cant stand hearing them reiterate how afraid we should be if we dont vote for them over and over.
  • I call into question any leader that advocates continued military action in Iraq. We should have stopped once we got Hussein, and moved our focus back into Afghanistan. Now we’re stuck in a country defending a people that are going to be hard-pressed to defend themselves against their neighbors once we are gone. This in mind, the killing should be stopped now…
  • I really don’t like “Face-man” approaches to serious topics. In this, Obama has disappointed me greatly, I think his writers and logicians needs some help. He’s got the right ideas, but the topics needs to be spot-on. When you say you’re going to do something, say HOW you’re going to do it. Obama isn’t really good at this. Now a key point here, there are actually detailed plans, however Obama is tactful in that he doesn’t give away a lot to the media for fear of influencing the votes he already has in the bag and/or ruining the chances of getting more.

Here are some serious considerations I don’t think are getting enough attention, mainly because there is no good answer, but they NEED to be addressed:
HEALTHCARE
The evolution of health care in almost every world demographic and a pseudo-nationalized health care system. This terminology is being avoided at all costs, but a health care system that is going to benefit the most citizens in the United States is non-commercial and standardized/regulated heavily…price-fixed if anything. This will in turn impact the 2nd largest lobby demographic in the US….Healthcare & Drugs.

ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY. Deliberately downplayed by emphasizing priorities in energy independence. What the hell are we going to do to support the environment AND maintain energy independence? According to our candidates…it’s one big non-solution, and it needs to be out in the open regarding our direction as a nation.

Real outside-the-box solutions…nothing is being talked about and there are some seriously ingenious ideas out there.

FAIR TAX
So far outside the box it could work. The problem? The banking institution that runs the money for the government disappears. Politicians no likey ;)

GREEN CITIES
Chattanooga…of all the ideas…this is by far the most extraordinary….

BETTER EDUCATION and ENDING HEROIFICATION
Aside from third-world countries without education systems, our education system is one of the lowest…we need to look at more successful systems that are feasible for us as a nation. In addition we need to stop a very bad strain of censorship called heroification1

There are MORE ideas out there that deserve a level of consideration from our candidates.

Regarding the smaller political parties…
Let me be clear. I DONT LIKE ANY POLITICAL PARTIES. In rendering yourself exclusive to one party, you maintain an obligation that you might not have the balls to break away from later. There is no one group of individuals in the country that has all the right answers, and in supporting party politics I feel the wisdom we exemplify as individuals is lost en masse. The smaller political parties are smaller for a reason, they don’t appeal to enough people, either financially, ethically or individually. Most of the time this is because politicians want to win and consistently use their party to win votes rather than vice versa. Creating a different party isnt an answer…it’s just a natural reaction with so many opinions on our nations direction are flying around.

Remember, if you don’t like these opinions, I humbly refer you to the disclaimer regarding my posts at the bottom of the page. However…feel free to read and comment, I invite debate….seriously. Just don’t get all personal about it and I will refrain from reconsidering your usefulness in the gene pool ;)

  1. Heroification is a term used by James Loewen in Lies My Teacher Told Me i.e. – “Heroification, a degenerative process that makes people over into heroes.”

Sarah Palin (you know…the pit bull that associates herself with hockey-moms..<- TYPO!…*snicker*) will be getting a meeting with Henry Kissinger, Colombian President Alvaro Uribe, Afghan President Hamid Karzai, Georgian President Mikhail Saakashvili, Ukrainian President Viktor Yuschenko, Iraqi President Jalal Talabani, Pakistani President Asif Ali Zardari and Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh this week.

I don’t honestly know where to begin.

Let me start with this…I am utterly positive I would be more damn productive in meetings with these leaders.

Kissinger first, because he is THE guy. He’s like a living Confucius. Known to have one of the most eloquent and heavy hitting vocabularies, combined with rubbing shoulders with almost very world leader in the last half century. If you needed to to mentally prepare for arguments, debates, and conversations with the above list of leaders, Kissinger will always be on your top five most wanted advisers. The meeting with Kissing is a BOLD and very strong move. Kissinger is a liberal Republican, and could possibly be the foundation for all liberal republicans (sounds weird saying that). Anyhow, this guy is more likely to save the world than most presidents, and is documented historically as a peacemaker.

The leaders appearing following her meeting with Kissinger are at the center of a significant amount of political and humanitarian turbulence in the world. I am honestly not sure that woman is mentally prepared for meeting a group of men, of whom almost every one come from societies in the midst of socio-political upheaval…no small part of which is centered around feminist and religious (r)evolution. Add to this the fact that she is a US governor with zero experience in foreign relations. I am almost positive she’s going to have them autograph something.

I may start griping more…but for now…for your reading enjoyment:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26840642/

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/22/us/politics/22veep.html?em

http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2008/09/sarah_palin_united_nations_jos.html

If only we could see this ad on TV. ;) Here we go!!!

See more Adam “Ghost Panther” McKay videos at Funny or Die

© 2010 Hold no virtue... Creative Commons License Suffusion WordPress theme by Sayontan Sinha